Irish historian Richard Bourke has argued
that, in fact, Edmund “Burke Was No Conservative” – so contemporary “conservatives
can’t claim [him] as one of their own.” The evidence? Burke – who supported the
American revolution and loved the American constitution – did not condemn all
revolts against established authority; and his defense of religion, property,
and government has been embraced by thinkers of “liberal” ideological stripes,
too. Perhaps. Yet, Burke once saw something the liberal intelligentsia did not –
and still doesn’t. In his “Reflections on the Revolution in France,” he
observed: “The effect of liberty to individuals is that they
may do what they please; we ought to see what it will please them to do, before
we risk congratulations which may be soon turned into complaints.”
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Monday, December 7, 2015
What a strapline!
A title appearing on the front web page of the NYT: “Her Films May Flop,
but Kate Hudson Remains a Fashion Star.” The pitch beneath the title: “As the actress adroitly merchandises her perceived
warmth and candor, she keeps an emotional connection with the public that
designers find valuable.” Apparently, the irony
here is lost on "the public."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)