Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Hilary Clinton’s progressive touch
In his comment on the Democratic presidential debate (“Hilary
Clinton’s Democratic Debate Magic”), NYT columnist Frank Bruni heaps praise on the
frontrunner, and mild disdain on her main opponent. In his words, “Sanders grew
redundant, returning with questionable frequency to a single issue – greed and income inequality –
that made him sound like a one-note candidate.” This is immediately qualified: “He’s 100 percent right to question corporations and
trumpet the plight of the middle class. But he does so as more of a firebrand,
calling for a ‘political revolution,’
than as someone who can be trusted to make meaningful progress.” Bruni then concludes that Sanders “evoked yesterday”
– “with
his slight hunch, his somewhat garbled style of speech, and a moment when he
cupped his hand behind his ear, signaling that he hadn’t heard the question.” How true, even if a bit insensitive directed at a
74-year-old. During the debate, Hilary billed herself as a “progressive who
likes to get things done” – and, as we all
know, progressives moved on a long time ago – focusing on areas where they
could, and did, effect meaningful change.